Optical scanning device and a scanning lens therefor

ABSTRACT

An optical scanning device of the present invention includes a simple scanning lens. At least one of opposite surfaces of the lens has a nonarcuate shape, as seen in a polarization plane. At least one of the opposite surfaces is a special toric surface. Further, in a plane perpendicular to the polarization plane, the lens has a meniscus shape concave toward a polarizer. With this configuration, the lens achieves a desirable uniform velocity scanning capability and a desirable field curvature in the main scanning direction. The lens is therefore free from errors in configuration ascribable to molding while reducing the limitation on the tolerance of optical elements in the optical axis direction as to assembly.

This application is a DIV of application Ser. No. 09/352,872 filed Jul. 13, 1999, U.S. Pat. No. 6,141,133, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/177,658, filed Oct. 23, 1998, U.S. Pat. No. 5,986,791, which is a DIV of application Ser. No. 08/738,979, filed Oct. 24, 1996, U.S. Pat. No. 5,875,051.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an optical scanning device for use in an image forming apparatus, and a scanning lens therefor.

In an optical scanning device for an optical printer, digital copier or similar image forming apparatus, a deflector deflects, at a uniform angular velocity, a beam issuing from a light source and forming a line image elongate in a direction corresponding to a main scanning direction. A scanning lens converges the deflected beam to a desired surface to be scanned in the form of a beam spot. The scanning device scans the desired surface at a uniform velocity with the beam spot. The direction corresponding to the main scanning direction refers to a direction parallel to the main scanning direction at any position on a virtual optical path which is formed by developing linearly an optical path between the light source and the desired surface along the optical axis. Likewise, a direction corresponding to a subscanning direction refers to a direction parallel to a subscanning direction at any position on the above virtual path.

It is a common practice with the scanning device to use a single scanning lens in order to reduce the size and cost of the device. A single scanning lens is taught in, e.g., Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 7-174998. An image forming lens for scanning is disclosed in, e.g., Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 4-50908.

To prevent the scanning lens from increasing in size, it is preferable that the lens be positioned as close to the deflector as possible. This, however, brings about a problem that the magnification of the lens in the subscanning direction increases. For example, if the position where the line image is formed is even slightly deviated on the virtual optical path due to the slight positional error of optical system for forming the line image in the optical axis direction, the focusing position of the beam spot in the subscanning direction is noticeably shifted. As a result, field curvatures are noticeably deteriorated, compared to designed field curvatures. This is particularly true with the field curvature in the subscanning direction.

While the scanning lens functions to cause the deflected beam to converge to the desired surface in the directions corresponding to the main and subscanning directions, it must implement uniform velocity scanning in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. To realize uniform velocity scanning and desirable field curvatures with a single lens, it is necessary that at least one surface of the lens has a special shape different from an arc in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. Generally, the scanning lens is implemented as a convex lens in order to converge the deflected beam to the desired surface in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. For this reason, the lens is often formed by molding plastics. However, the problem is that when the lens is provided with a biconvex configuration, the thickness is apt to increase in the paraxial portion and noticeably differs from the paraxial portion to the peripheral portion. Consequently, the lens implemented as a molding of plastics often suffers from sinking, waving and other errors in configuration. The lens with such errors has critically low performance in practice although the designed performance may be optimal. This problem is particularly serious when a wide-angle lens is desired to render the scanning device compact or to extend the scanning angle range, or when a lens is located in the vicinity of the deflector in order to reduce the size of the lens.

When use is made of a single lens, uniform velocity scanning capability will be effectively promoted if the surface of the lens facing the deflector is provided with a convex shape. In the case, however, the thickness of the lens decreases with a decrease in the radius of curvature, aggravating the difference in thickness between the paraxial portion and the peripheral portion. Moreover, if the radius of curvature of the surface facing the deflector is small, the angle at which the deflected beam is incident to the above surface, i.e., the angle between the outward normal of the surface and the principal ray of the incident beam increases in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. This is likely to deteriorate the field curvatures and uniform velocity scanning due to the errors in the configuration of the above surface.

In addition, the scanning device should preferably have a compact and broad effective main scanning width. The deflector therefore must have a broad effective deflection angle.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an optical scanning device having desirable performance including field curvatures in main and subscanning directions and uniform velocity scanning capability, and implementing a broad effective main scanning width, and a scanning lens therefor.

It is another object of the present invention to provide an optical scanning device which frees a single scanning lens implemented as a molding of plastics from errors in configuration, and the scanning lens.

It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an optical scanning device reducing the limitation on the tolerance of optical elements in the optical axis elements as to assembly, and a scanning lens therefor.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide an optical scanning device capable of reducing the deviation of a single scanning lens as to a beam spot diameter ascribable to the image height of the beam spot, and the scanning lens.

It is an additional object of the present invention to provide a compact and high performance optical scanning device using a single scanning lens.

In accordance with the present invention, in an optical scanning device for causing a deflector to deflect at a uniform angular velocity a beam forming a line image elongate in a direction corresponding to a main scanning direction with a reflection surface adjoining a position where the line image is formed, and for causing a scanning lens to converge a deflected beam output from the deflector to a desired surface to be scanned in the form of a beam spot, thereby optically scanning the desired surface at a uniform velocity, the lens is a single lens whose opposite surfaces are convex in a deflection plane. At least one of opposite surfaces of the lens has, in the deflection plane, a nonarcuate shape determined by R, K, A, B, C, D . . . included in:

 X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y/R)²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+

where X is the coordinate in the optical axis direction, Y is the coordinate in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, R is the paraxial radius of curvature, K is a cone constant, and A, B, C, D . . . are high degree coefficients. At least one of the opposite surfaces is a special toric surface such that a line connecting the centers of curvatures of the at least one surface in planes perpendicular to the deflection plane forms a curve different in shape from the at least one surface. An effective main scanning width W, a thickness d₁ of the lens on the optical axis and a distance L between the deflection start point of the deflector and the desired surface satisfy the following relations (1) and (2):

W/L>0.9  (1)

10<(W/L)²·(L/d₁)<30  (2)

In addition, the lens is implemented as a moulding of plastics.

Also, in accordance with the present invention, in an optical scanning device for causing a deflector to deflect at a uniform angular velocity a beam forming a line image elongate in a direction corresponding to a main scanning direction with a reflection surface adjoining a position where the line image is formed, and for causing an imaging forming lens to converge a deflected beam output from the deflector to a desired surface to be scanned in the form of a beam spot, thereby optically scanning the desired surface at a uniform velocity, the lens is a single lens. At least one of opposite surfaces of the lens has, in the deflection plane, a nonarcuate shape determined by R, K, A, B, C, D . . . included in:

X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y²+L /R²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+

where X is the coordinate in an optical axis direciton, Y is the coordinate in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, R is the paraxial radius of curvature, K is a cone constant, and A, B, C, D . . . are high degree coefficients. At least one of the opposite surfaces is a special toric surface such that a line connecting the centers of curvature of the at least one surface in planes perpendicular to the deflection plane forms a curve different in shape from the at least one surface. A shape in a plane perpendicular to the deflection plane containing the optical axis is a meniscus shape with the concave surface facing the deflector.

Further, in accordance with the present invention, a scanning lens converges a beam deflected by a deflector at a uniform angular velocity to a desired surface to be scanned with respect to a direction corresponding to a main scanning direction, and causes the desired surface to be scanned at a uniform velocity in the main scanning direction. The lens is a biconvex single lens and implemented as a molding of plastics. A first and a second surface of the lens, as counted from the deflector side, each has, in a deflection plane, a nonarcuate shape determined by R, K, A, B, C, D . . . included in:

X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y/R)²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+

where X is the coordinate in the optical axis direciton, Y is the coordinate in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, R is the paraxial radius of curvature, K is a cone constant, and A, B, C, D . . . are high degree coefficients. An effective main scanning width W, a thickness d₁ of the scanning lens on the optical axis and a distance L between the deflection start point of the deflector and the desired surface satisfy following relations (1) and (2):

 W/L>0.9  (1)

10<(W/L)²·(L/d₁)<30  (2)

Moreover, in accordance with the present invention, a scanning lens converges a beam deflected by a deflector at a uniform angular velocity to a desired surface to be scanned with respect to a direction corresponding to a main scanning direction, and causes the desired surface to be scanned at a uniform velocity. The lens is a single lens in which at least a surface facing the deflector has a convex shape in a paraxial portion in a deflection plane. The lens is implemented as a molding of plastics. A first and a second surface of the lens, as counted from the deflector side, each has, in the deflection plane, a nonarcuate shape determined by R, K, A, B, C, D . . . included in:

X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y/R)²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+

where X is the coordinate in the optical axis direciton, Y is the coordinate in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis, R is the paraxial radius of curvature, K is a cone constant, and A, B, C, D . . . are high degree coefficients. An effective main scanning width W, a thickness d₁ of the scanning lens in the optical axis direction and a distance L between the deflection start point of the deflector and the desired surface satisfy the following relations (1) and (2):

W/L>0.9  (1)

10<(W/L)²·(L/d₁)<30  (2)

In addition, a focal distance fm in the deflection plane and the paraxial radius of curvature R₁ of the first surface in the deflection plane satisfy a condition (3):

 1.0<R1/fm<3.0  (3).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIGS. 1A and 1B show a first embodiment of the optical scanning device in accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 2A-2C are views showing a nonarcuate toric surface and special toric surfaces;

FIG. 3 are views representative of conditions (3) and (4) to be described;

FIGS. 4-16 plot field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Examples 1-13 of the first embodiment;

FIGS. 17A-17C show a second embodiment of the optical scanning device in accordance with the present invention; and

FIGS. 18-32 plot field curvatures and distortional aberrations relating to Examples 1-15 of the second embodiment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Preferred embodiments of the optical scanning device and a scanning lens therefore in accordance with the present invention will be described hereinafter.

1st Embodiment

Referring to FIGS. 1A and 1B of the drawings, an optical scanning device embodying the present invention is shown. As shown, the device includes a laser diode or emission source (LD) 10 and a coupling lens 12. The coupling lens 12 constitutes a light source together with the LD 10. A divergent beam issuing from the LD 10 is coupled by the coupling lens 12 and then converged by a cylinder lens 14 in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction (perpendicular to the sheet surface of FIG. 1A). As a result, the beam forms an line image elongate in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction on a reflection surface 16 included in a deflector. In the illustrative embodiment, the deflector is assumed to be a rotary single-surface mirror. The reflection surface 16 has an axis of rotation 16A lying in the surface 16. The line image is formed such that its principal ray runs through the position of the axis 16A. This embodiment is free from the deviation between the line image and the reflection surface 16, i.e., so-called sag ascribable to the rotation of the surface 16. The cylinder lens 14 may be replaced with a concave cylinder mirror, if desired.

When the reflection surface 16 rotates at a uniform angular velocity, the reflected beam is also deflected at a uniform angular velocity and turns out a deflected beam. The deflected beam is incident to a single scanning lens 18. The lens 18 focuses the incident beam in the form of a spot onto a desired surface 20 to be scanned. As a result, the surface 20 is scanned at a uniform velocity. Usually, a photoconductive element is located at the surface 20 and scanned by the above beam spot to form an image thereon.

As shown in FIG. 1A, the lens 18 is a biconvex lens, as seen in a deflection plane. The lens 18 may have any shape in the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane and including an optical axis AX; it may also be biconvex. Assume that the lens 18 has a meniscus shape with the concave surface facing the deflector, as seen in the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane and containing the optical axis. Then, as shown in FIG. 1B, both the front principal plane H and the rear principal plane H′ can be set at the surface 20 side. Even when the lens 18 is positioned in the vicinity of the deflector, the principal planes H and H′ are positioned closer to the surface 20 than the substance of the lens 18. This successfully reduces the increases in the lateral magnification in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction. As a result, the limitation on the tolerance as to the assembly of the cylinder lens 14 in the optical axis direction is effectively relaxed.

Assume that the effective main scanning width of the lens 18 is W, and that the distance between the deflection start point of the deflector and the surface 20 is L. Then, the width W and distance L satisfy a condition:

 W/L>0.9  condition (1)

The above condition (1) holds when the image height is zero; the distance L is equal to S(0)+d(0)+l(0) shown in FIG. 1A. As the ratio W/L increases, the angle of view of the lens 18 increases and renders the scanning device more compact. When the ratio W/L decreases below the lower limit of 0.9, a broad effective main scanning width and therefore a compact arrangement is not achievable.

Assuming that the lens 18 has a thickness d₁, then the width W, length L and thickness d₁ satisfy a condition:

10<(W/L)²·(L/d₁)<30  condition (2)

To implement a compact scanning device with a scanning lens whose thickness differs little from its paraxial portion to its peripheral portion, it is preferable that the ratio L/d₁ (d₁=d(0) shown in FIG. 1A) and the product (W/L)²·(L/d₁) satisfy the above condition (2).

As the parameter (W/L)²·(L/d₁) of the condition (2) decreases with the condition (1) satisfied, the thickness d₁ on the optical axis and therefore the difference in thickness between the paraxial portion and the peripheral portion increases. This is undesirable when it comes to the molding of plastics. As the parameter (W/L)²·(L/d₁) decreases below the lower limit of 10 included in the condition (2), the above disadvantage is aggravated. This brings about sinking or waving in the event of molding. While values above the upper limit of 30 included in the condition (2) reduce the difference in thickness and promotes accurate molding, the resulting lenses will be too thin to implement field curvatures and uniform velocity scanning.

On the other hand, when the beam incident to the lens 18 is a parallel beam, i.e., when the lens 18 is used as an f-θ lens, the condition (2) poses a heavy limitation on design freedom. Specifically, to satisfy the condition (2) when the beam incident to the lens 18 is a parallel beam, the ratio d(0)/l(0) shown in FIG. 1A must be limited to about 0.2. As a result, the position of the lens 18 is extremely limited. This limitation on design freedom can be obviated if the beam incident to the lens 18 is divergent or convergent with respect to the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction.

A nonarcuate toric surface and a special toric surface will be described. A toric surface is defined as a curved surface which an arc forms when rotated about a line or axis lying in the same plane as the arc, but not passing through the center of the arc. A nonarcuate toric surface is a plan which a nonarcuate shape forms when rotated about a line or axis lying in the same plane as the nonarcuate shape.

FIG. 2A shows a specific nonarcuate toric surface. In FIG. 2A, X(Y) is representative of a nonarcuate shape produced by:

X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y/R)²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+  Eq. (1)

where X is the coordinate of the lens 18 in the optical axis direction, Y is the coordinate in the deflection plane in the direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction, R is the paraxial radius of curvature, K is the cone constant, and A, B, C, D and so forth are higher degree coefficients.

The nonarcuate toric surface shown in FIG. 2A is formed when the nonarcuate shape (X(Y)) is rotated about an axis ax parallel to the Y axis. Assume that the Y coordinate of a section in a plane parallel to the XZ plane is Y=η. Then, the radius of curvature of the nonarcuate toric surface in the above section is r(η), as shown in FIG. 2A. In the nonarcuate toric surface, the centers of curvatures in the planes parallel to the XZ plane coincide with the axis ax without exception. That is, a line connecting the above centers of curvatures is the axis ax itself.

FIGS. 2B and 2C each shows a particular special toric surface. In FIGS. 2B and 2C, X(Y) is representative of a curve lying in the XY plane. While X(Y) is shown as being nonarcuate, it may be a simple arc or a line parallel to the Y axis. In the special toric surfaces, at each point of the curve X(Y), the radius of curvature in a plane parallel to the XZ plane is defined as a function of the coordinate Y. Further, the center of curvature at each Y coordinate position lies in the XY plane. Moreover, a curve L(Y) connecting the centers of curvatures also lies in the XY plane. In addition, the curve L(Y) is different in shape from the curve X(Y). In the special toric surface of FIG. 2B, the curve L(Y) is located at the opposite side to the paraxial center of curvature (paraxial radius of curvature R) of the curve X(Y). On the other hand, in the special toric surface of FIG. 2C, the curve L(Y) is located at the same side as the paraxial center of curvature of the curve X(Y).

In the following description, the surfaces of the lens 18 lying in the deflection plane and facing the deflector and the surface 20, respectively, will be represented by X₁ (Y) and X₂(Y). Y is the coordinate in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction and having the optical axis AX as an origin. Let the surfaces of the lens 18 facing the deflector and the surface 20, respectively, and in the plane in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction be represented by r_(s1)(Y) and r_(s2)(Y); r_(s1)(Y) is the radius of curvature, at the coordinate Y, of the surface facing the deflector and lying in the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane while r_(s2)(Y) is the radius of curvature, at the coordinate Y, of the surface facing the surface 20 and lying in the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane.

In the illustrative embodiment, at least one of the lens surfaces X₁ (Y) and X₂ (Y) has a nonarcuate shape while at least one of them is a special toric surface. Therefore, by selecting the nonarcuate surface adequately, it is possible to correct field curvature and uniform velocity scanning characteristic in the main scanning direction optimally. In addition, by selecting the special toric surface adequately, it is possible to correct field curvature and uniform velocity scanning characteristic in the subscanning direction optimally. For example, both surfaces of the lens 18 may be nonarcuate surfaces, as seen in the deflection plane, or may be special toric surfaces. This enhances the free correction of field curvature and uniform velocity scanning characteristic in the main and subscanning directions, and thereby make the correction easier.

FIG. 3A shows the chief principal ray of the beam deflected by an angle θ at the position of the axis of rotation 16A of the reflection surface 16. The principal ray, labeled ln1, is incident to the surface of the lens 18 facing the deflector at a position Y in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. The principal ray ln1 is refracted by the lens 18 to turn out a ray ln2. The ray ln2 is propagated through the lens 18 until it leaves the lens 18 as a ray ln3. The ray ln3 is output from the surface of the lens 18 facing the surface 20 at a position Y′ in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. Then, the ray ln3 is incident to the surface 20.

As shown in FIG. 3A, the distance between the position where the line image is formed (position of the axis of rotation 16A) and the point of incidence, i.e., the length of the ray ln1 is S(θ). The distance between the incident point and the exit point, i.e., the length of the ray ln2 in the lens 18 is d(θ). Further, the distance between the exit point and the image forming point in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction, i.e., the length of the ray ln3 is l(θ). The plane containing the parts ln1, ln2 and ln3 of the principal ray and perpendicular to the sheet surface of FIG. 3A is the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane. In such a perpendicular plane containing the ray ln1, the radius of curvature of the lens surface in the proximity of the ray at a position Y is r_(s1)′(Y). Likewise, in the perpendicular plane containing the ray ln2, the radius of curvature of the lens surface in the proximity of the ray at a position Y′ is r_(s2)′(Y). Therefore, Y is equal to Y′ when the deflection angle θ is zero degree. In this condition, S(0), d(0) and l(0) shown in FIG. 1A hold, and the sum thereof is the previously stated length L of the optical path.

FIG. 3B is a section of the lens 18 in the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane containing the optical axis. In FIG. 3B, A indicates the deflection start point of the principal ray by the reflection surface 16 while B indicates the image forming position (in the subscanning direction) of the beam spot. H and H′ respectively indicate the front and rear principal planes on the optical axis in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction. Assume that the deviation between the surface of the lens 18 facing the deflector and the principal plane H is ΔH(0), and that the deviation between the other surface of the lens 18 facing the surface 20 and the rear principal plane H′ is ΔH′(0). Then, the deviations ΔH(0) and ΔH′(0) are expressed as: $\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \quad {H(0)}} = {{- {r_{S1}^{\prime}(0)}} \times {{d(0)}/\left\lbrack {{n\left\{ {{r_{s2}^{\prime}(0)} - {r_{s1}^{\prime}(0)}} \right\}} + {\left( {n - 1} \right) \cdot {d(0)}}} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {= {{- {r_{s1}^{\prime}(0)}} \times {P(0)}}} \end{matrix}$ Δ  H^(′)(0) = −r_(s2)^(′)(0) × P(0)

In this condition, the lateral magnification β(0) in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction has an absolute value produced by: $\begin{matrix} {{{\beta (0)}} = {\left\{ {{1(0)} - {\Delta \quad {H^{\prime}(0)}}} \right\}/\left\{ {{S(0)} + {\Delta \quad {H(0)}}} \right\}}} \\ {= {\left\{ {{1(0)} + {{r_{s2}^{\prime}\left( Y^{\prime} \right)} \cdot {P(0)}}} \right\}/\left\{ {{S(0)} - {{r_{s1}^{\prime}(Y)}{P(0)}}} \right\}}} \end{matrix}$

where r_(S1)′(0)=r_(S1)(0) and r_(S2)′(0)=r_(S2)(0).

Therefore, by providing the lens 18 with the above meniscus shape (r_(s2)(0)<0 and r_(s1)(0)<0), it is possible to bring both the front and rear principal points closer to the image, i.e., to the surface 20 and reduce the magnification |β(0)| in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction. In this case, the longitudinal magnification is β²(0).

In FIG. 1A, when the position of the cylinder lens 14, for example, is deviated by Δ in the optical axis direction, the imaging forming position of the beam spot in the subscanning direction is shifted by Δ×β²(0) in the optical axis direction. Therefore, to accommodate a greater positional error Δ, the absolute value |β(0)| of the magnification should preferably be as small as possible. While the lens 18 may be brought closer to the surface 20 in order to reduce |β(0)| such an approach is apt to increase the thickness and effective diameter (in the main scanning direction) of the lens 18.

The illustrative embodiment accommodates a greater tolerance as to the assembly of the optical elements in the optical axis direction while implementing to make the lens 18 be compact by positioning it as close to the deflector as possible. This can be done if the following condition is satisfied:

 1.45≦|β(0)|≦4.75  condition (3)

If |β(0)| decreases below the above lower limit of the condition (3), the thickness of the lens 18 increases, and moreover it is difficult to correct the field curvatures and uniform velocity scanning characteristic desirably. If |β(0)| increases above the upper limit, the tolerance in the main scanning direction is severely restricted.

FIG. 3C shows an image forming condition with respect to the principal ray of the beam deflected by the angle θ. As shown, ΔH(θ) and ΔH′(θ) are expressed as: $\begin{matrix} {{\Delta \quad {H(\theta)}} = {{- {r_{s1}^{\prime}(Y)}} \times {{d(\theta)}/\left\lbrack {{n\left\{ {{r_{s2}^{\prime}\left( Y^{\prime} \right)} - {r_{s1}^{\prime}(Y)}} \right\}} + {\left( {n - 1} \right) \cdot {d(\theta)}}} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {= {{- {r_{s1}^{\prime}(Y)}} \times {P(\theta)}}} \end{matrix}$ Δ  H^(′)(θ) = −r_(s2)^(′)(Y^(′)) × P(θ)

The lateral magnification in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction with respect to the beam with the deflection angle θ has the following absolute value:

|B(θ)|={I(θ)+r_(s2)′(Y′)·P(θ)}/{S(θ)−r_(s1)′(Y)P(θ)}

Then, when the beam with the deflection angle θ forms a spot at a point B, the spot has a diameter:

ω₁=|β(θ)|·ω₀

where ω0 is the beam width, in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction, of the line image formed at the deflection start point.

If |β(θ)| is noticeably deviated depending on the deflection angle θ, the diameter of the spot in the subscanning direction also noticeably changes. The allowable deviation of the spot diameter between image heights is usually less than ±5%.

In the illustrative embodiment, |β(θ)| satisfies the following condition in the effective scanning range:

0.95|β(0)|≦|β(θ)|≧1.05|β(0)|  condition (4)

The above condition (4) must be satisfied in order to stabilize the spot diameter in the subscanning direction. The values r_(s1)′(Y) and r_(s2)′(Y′) are so selected as to satisfy the condition (4).

In the foregoing description, the deflector is assumed to be a rotary single-surface or two-surface mirror or a polygonal mirror free from sag. Although a polygonal mirror (used as the deflector) is apt to bring about sag and thereby slightly deteriorate the field curvatures and uniform velocity scanning characteristic, this can be improved on the basis of, e.g., the shift or the tilt of the lens 18.

Specific examples of the illustrative embodiment will be described hereinafter. Referring again to FIG. 1A, the beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 may turn out a parallel beam, a weak divergent beam or a weak convergent beam. Assume that the beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 turns out a weak convergent beam, that the deflection angle θ of the reflection surface 16 is zero degree, and that the cylinder lens 14 and lens 18 are absent. Then, the beam converges to a point Q rearward of the rear of the surface 20. Let this point Q be referred to as a natural convergence point. The distance between the deflection start point of the reflection surface 16 and the natural convergence point Q is labeled as S. Assume that the distance S is positive when the point Q is positioned at the surface 20 side or negative when it is positioned closer to the light source than the reflection surface 16. When the distance S is negative, the coupled beam is a weak divergent beam. When the coupled beam is a parallel beam, there holds S=∞.

Examples to be described assume a deflector free from sag. η is the refractive index associated with the wavelength (780 nm) of the material of the lens 18 used. The nonarcuate shape is determined on the basis of the Eq. (1) using R, K, A, B, C and D. As for a special toric surface, the radius of curvature r_(si)(Y) (i=1, 2) at the coordinate in the plane perpendicular to the deflection plane is determined by giving coefficients a, b, c, d, e, f . . . in the following equation:

r_(s1)(y)=a+bY²+cY⁴+dY⁶+eY⁸+fY¹⁰+ . . .   Eq. (2)

In the notation of the higher degree coefficients A, B, C, D, b, c, d, e, f, . . . , E and a numerical value following it indicate power. For example, “E-9” means 10⁻⁹. The unit of an amount having a dimension of distance is mm.

EXAMPLE 1

W = 216, L = 213.2, S = 3245.2 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak convergent beam) S(0) = 49.0 nonarcuate toric surface d(0) = 21.754 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 142.446 surface facing deflector: nonarcuate toric surface X₁(Y) (arcuate shape) R = 461.302, K = 35.937, A = −2.205E−7, B = 2.732E−11, C = −4.9587E−15, D = 1.6248E−19 r_(s1)(Y) r_(s1)(0) = −73.845 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (arcuate shape) R = −97.244 in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ a = −20.63952, b = 8.2661E−4 c = 1.3218E−7, d = 2.09082E−11 e = −5.3157E−15, f = −4.71E−19 in conditon (1): W/L = 1.01 in condition (2) (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 10.1

FIG. 4 shows field curvatures, uniform scanning velocity characteristic and linearity relating to Example 1. The uniform velocity scanning characteristic is defined as [{h′(θ)−h(θ)}×100(%) where h(θ)(=constant×θ) is the ideal image height for the deflection angle θ while h′(θ) is the actual image height. In FIG. 4, a field curvature in the main scanning direction and a field curvature in the subscanning direction are indicated by a dashed curve and a solid curve, respectively.

EXAMPLE 2

W = 216, L = 174.9, S = ∞ (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a parallel beam) S(0) = 29.887 coaxial nonspherical surface d(0) = 12.364 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 132.649 surface facing deflector: coaxial nonspherical surface shape appearing when a nonarcuate shape is rotated about the optical axis (X axis) and determined by R = 137.503 K = −92.438, A = −1.11822E−6, B = 7.28745E−10 C = −3.20311E−13, D = 9.55204E−17 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X2(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −154.248, K = 5.36873, A = −2.51300E−6, B = 1.95625E−9, C = −1.18490E−12, D = 3.38272E−16, in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ a = −17.0750, b = −4.7190E−3 c = 1.1918E−5, d = −2.3684E−8 e = 2.2979E−11, f = −8.0723E−15 in condition (1): W/L = 1.23 in condition (2): (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 21.6

FIG. 5 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 2.

EXAMPLE 3

W = 216, L = 174.9, S = −387.690 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak divergent beam) S(0) = 22.381 coaxial nonspherical surface d(0) = 10.000 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 142.519 surface facing deflector: coaxial nonspherical surface shape appearing when a nonarcuate shape is rotated about the optical axis (X) and determined by R = 108.503, K = −56.32541, A = −3.46610E−6, B = 1.98195E−9 C = −132.194E−13, D = 5.00528E−17 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface S₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −121.259, K = 4.91312, A = −3.24924E−6, B = 1.44308E−9, C = −1.89357E−12, D = 1.43613E−15, in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ a = −13.9150, b = −6.6641E−3, c = 1.0956E−5, d = −6.2958E−9, e = 3.4232E−12, f = −3.6141E−15 in condition (1): W/L = 1.23 in condition (2): (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 26.7

FIG. 6 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 3.

EXAMPLE 4

W = 216, L = 224.939, S = 774.830 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak convergent beam) S(0) = 51.669 coaxial nonspherical surface d(0) = 10.390 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 162.880 surface facing deflector: coaxial nonspherical surface shape appearing when a nonarcuate shape is rotated about the optical axis (X axis) and determined by R = 148.864, K = 5.4534, A = −7.09267E−7, B = −2.21975E−10, C = 6.07139E−14, D = −8.33979E−18 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −562.372, K = −462.3035, A = −4.60398E−7, B = −2.89720E−11, C = −5.93656E−14, D = 1.75926E−17 in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ a = −26.3310, b = −5.2874E−3 c = 1.9092E−6, d = −3.4661E−10, e = 8.6372E−13, f = −3.6498E−16 in condition (1): W/L = 0.96 in condition (2): (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 20.0

FIG. 7 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 4.

EXAMPLE 5

W = 216, L = 175.201, S = −375.922 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak divergent beam) S(0) = 22.274 nonarcuate toric surface d(0) = 10.0 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 142.927 surface facing deflector: nonarcuate toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 107.1, K = −60.196, A = −3.5107E−6, B = 2.06849E−9 C = −8.9722E−14, D = 1.1672E−17 r_(si)(Y) r_(s1)(0) = −60.0 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −119.99, K = 4.78039, A = −3.4156E−6, B = 1.5437E−9, C = −18765E−12, D = 1.4637E−15, in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ a = −11.4579, b = −4.3509E−3, c = 8.8457E−6, d = −6.9161E−9 e = 5.3831E−12, f = 3.2985E−15 in condition (1): W/L = 1.23 in condition (2): (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 26.6

FIG. 8 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 5.

EXAMPLE 6

W = 216, L = 175.201, S = −375.922 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak divergent beam) S(0) = 22.274 special toric surface d(0) = 10.0 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 142.927 surface facing deflector: special toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 107.1, K = −60.197 A = −3.5107E−6, B = 2.0684E−9, C = −8.9722E−14, D = 1.1672E−17 in r_(s1)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ + gY¹² a = −22, b = −2.5751E−1, c = 4.49657E−3, d = −4.466449E−5, e = 1.956944E−7, f = −3.87E−10, g = 2.792783E−13 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −119.11, K = 4.78039, A = −3.4156E−6, B = 1.5437E−9 C = −1.8756E−12, D = 1.4637E−15 in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ + gY¹² a = −9.807, b = −1.662605E−2 c = 1.870374E−4, d = −12.7425E−6, e = 4.079722E−9, f = −6.029437E−12, g = 3.315003E−15 in condition (1): W/L = 1.23 in condition (2): (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 26.6 S(θ), d(θ), l(θ), r_(s1)′(Y′) are listed below. θ 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 S(θ) 22.274 22.689 23.997 26.399 28.509 30.261 32.924 d(θ) 10 9.876 9.452 8.551 7.635 6.793 5.386 l(θ) 142.887 144.327 148.338 154.765 159.674 163.608 168.608 r_(s1)′(Y) −22 −24.732 −27.589 −36.35 −43.735 −55.259 −69.233 r_(s2)′(Y′) −9.807 −10.101 −10.495 −11.382 −12.042 −12.761 −13.572

B(θ) are calculated by substituting the above data for the right side of P(θ). Then, |β(θ)| and |β(θ)|/|β(0)| with respect to the deflection angle θ are produced, as listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 3.94 8.207 13.2 16.757 19.451 23.281 |β(θ)| 4.42 4.47 4.49 4.53 4.53 4.55 4.52 |β(θ)|/|β(0)| 1.0 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.02 in condition (3): |β(θ)| = 4.42 in condition (4): |β(0)| ≦ |β(θ)| ≦ 1.03 |β(0)|

FIG. 9 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 6.

EXAMPLE 7

W = 216, L = 174.9, S = 554.6 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak convergent beam) S(0) = 38.916 special toric surface d(0) = 15.0 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 120.984 surface facing deflector: special toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 168.191, K = −39.924, A = −3.4224E−7, B = 2.2729E−13, C = 8.0109E−15, D = −8.7059E−19 in r_(s1)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + dY⁸ + fY¹⁰ + gY¹² a = −31, b = −3.26507E−2, c = −2.90654E−4, d = 5.99426E−7, e = −3.979759E−10, f = 4.109081E−14, g = 2.443981E−17 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −188.994, K = −4.83792, A = −4.9817E−7, B = 7.7236E−12, C = −1.6386E−14, D = 1.7827E−18 in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + dY⁸ + fY¹⁰ + gY¹² a = −13.91, b = −2.866184E−3, c = −1.21239E−5, d = 2.690094E−8 e = 2.090761E−11, f = 6.668513E−15, g = −6.734702E−19 in condition (1): W/L = 1.23 in condition (2): (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 17.8 S(θ), d(θ), l(θ), r_(s1)′(Y) and r_(s2)′(Y′) are listed below. θ 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 S(θ) 38.916 39.656 42.01 46.417 50.376 53.81 58.794 d(θ) 15 14.747 13.884 12.038 10.135 8.354 5.324 l(θ) 121.012 122.213 125.713 131.319 135.629 138.898 143.746 r_(s1)′(Y) −31 −32.676 −43.121 −62.437 −69.544 −84.248 −101.250 r_(s2)′(Y′) −13.91 −14.145 −15.21 −16.769 −17.478 −18.376 −19.395

B(θ) are calculated by substituting the above data for the right side (?) of P(θ).

Then, |β(θ)| and |β(θ)|/|β(0)| with respect to the deflection angle θ are produced, as listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 y 0 6.886 14.368 23.208 29.610 34.524 41.573 |β(θ)| 2.19 2.20 2.25 2.29 2.28 2.27 2.27 |β(θ)|/ 1.0 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 |β(0)| in condition (3): |β(θ)| = 2.19 in condition (4): |β(0)| ≦ |β(θ)| ≦ 1.04 |β(0)|

FIG. 10 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 7.

EXAMPLE 8

W = 216, L = 174.9, S = 316.7 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak convergent beam) S(0) = 48.618 special toric surface d(0) = 20.0 n = 1.53664 special toric surface l(0) = 106.282 surface facing deflector: special toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 200.224, K = −30.5827, A = −1.5926E−7, B = 2.2729E−13, C = 8.0109E−15, D = −3.98579E−19 in r_(s1)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + dY⁸ + fY¹⁰ + gY¹² a = 30, b = 1.521146E−2, c = −6.399798E−5, d = 1.166608E−7, e = −9.651438E−11, f = 3.652588E−14, g = −5.073881E−18 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −224.092, K = 1.19901, A = −3.2013E−7, B 7.0624E−12, C = −9.2418E−15, D 1.9593E−18 in r_(s2)(Y) = a + bY² + cY⁴ + dY⁶ + eY⁸ + fY¹⁰ + gY¹² a = −15.32, b = 1.12584E−3, c = −3.490667E−6, d = 5.91427E−9 e = −4.057836E−12, f = 1.284796E−15, g = −1.500234E−19

S(θ), d(θ), l(θ), r_(S1)′(Y) and r_(S2)′(Y′) are listed below.

θ 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 S(θ) 48.618 49.552 52.533 58.152 63.255 67.611 74.444 d(θ) 20 19.662 18.494 15.956 13.296 10.774 6.411 l(θ) 106.282 1073.76 110.608 115.846 119.932 123.124 127.823 r_(s1)′(Y) −30.0 −28.769 −27.175 −24.561 −22.426 −19.745 −13.291 r_(s2)′(Y) −15.316 −15.220 −15.123 −14.736 −14.155 −13.233 −10.366

B(θ) are calculated by substituting the above data for the right side of P(θ). Then, |β(θ)| and |β(θ)|/|β(0)| with respect to the deflection angle θ are produced, as listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 8.605 17.967 29.076 37.180 43.459 52.640 |β(θ)| 1.45 1.45 1.44 1.42 1.41 1.41 1.40 |β(θ)|/ 1.0 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96 |β(0)| in condition (3): |β(0)| = 1.46 in condition (4): |β(0)| ≦ |β(θ)| ≦ 0.96 |β(0)|

FIG. 11 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 8.

EXAMPLE 9

S = −375.922 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak divergent beam). S(0) = 22.274 X₁(Y), r_(s1)(Y) d(0) = 10 n = 1.53664 X₂(&), r_(s2)(Y) l(0) = 142.927 surface facing deflector: nonarcuate toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 107.1, K = −60.197, A = −3.5107E−6, B = 2.0684E−9, C = −8.9722E−14, D = 1.1672E−17 r_(s1)(Y) r_(s1)(0) = −60.0 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −119.99, K = 4.78039 A = −3.4156E−6, B = 1.5437E−9, C = −1.8765E−12, D = 1.4637E−15

As for r_(S2)(Y), r_(S2)(Y′) with respect to the deflection angle 0 are listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y′ 0 4.935 10.107 15.775 19.523 22.190 25.721 r_(s2)(Y′) −11.46 −11.56 −11.82 −12.08 −12.13 −12.06 −11.86

By using a polynomial, r_(S2)(Y′) may be approximated as:

r_(S2)(Y′)=a+b·Y′²+c·Y′⁴+d·Y′⁶+e·Y′⁸+f·Y′¹⁰

Then, by use of Y′ and corresponding r_(S2)(Y′) shown above, the coefficients a, b, c, d, e and f are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a=−11.4579, b=−4.3509E-3, c=8.8457E-6,

d=−6.9161E-9, e=5.3831E-12,

f=−3.2985E-15

The above approximation was used for the calculation of aberration.

|β(0)|=4.74 holds and satisfies the above-mentioned condition (3).

In this connection, when the power in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction is assigned to only one surface of the lens 18, |β(0)| is 4.97 and does not satisfy the condition (3).

FIG. 12 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 9.

The uniform velocity scanning characteristic is defined as:

[{h′(θ)−h(θ)}/h(θ)]×100(%)

where h(θ) is the ideal image height for the deflection angle θ (=constant×θ) while h′(θ) is the actual image height.

In FIG. 12, a field curvature indicated by a dashed line and a field curvature indicated by a solid line correspond to the main scanning direction and subscanning direction, respectively.

EXAMPLE 10

S = −∞ (beam coupled by the coupling lens is a parallel beam) S(0) = 51.871 X₁(Y), r_(s1)(Y) d(0) = 21.754 n = 1.52664 X₂(Y), r_(s2)(Y) l(0) = 149.07 surface facing deflector: nonarcuate toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 461.302, K = −35.937, A = −2.205E−7, B = 2.732E−11, C = −4.9587E−15, D = 1.6048E−19 r_(s1)(Y) r_(s1)(0) = −73.845 surface facing surface: special toric surface X₂(Y): arcuate shape with R = −97.244

As for r_(s2)(Y), r_(s2)(Y′) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below.

θ (°) 0 6 14 26 32 36 41 Y′ 0 6.831 16.005 30.152 37.565 42.713 49.470 r_(s2)(Y′) −20.64 −20.6 −20.42 19.77 19.18 18.64 −17.75

By using a polynomial, r_(s2)(Y′) may be approximated as:

r_(s2)(Y′)=a+b·Y′²+c·Y′⁴+d·Y′⁶+e·P′⁸+f·Y′¹⁰

Then, by use of Y′ and corresponding r_(s2)(Y′) shown above, the coefficients a, b, c, d, e and f are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a=−20.63952, b=0.82661E-3, c=0.13218E-6,

d=0.209082E-10, e=−0.53157E-14,

f=4.71E-19

|β(0)|=2.09 holds and satisfies the condition (3).

FIG. 13 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 10. In this example, because the coupled beam is a parallel beam, the constant mentioned previously in relation to the uniform velocity scanning characteristic is the focal distance fin in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction. The uniform velocity scanning characteristic is the usual f-θ characteristic.

EXAMPLE 11

S = −375.922 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak divergent beam). S(0) = 22.274 X₁(Y), r_(s1)(Y) d(0) = 10 n = 1.53664 X₂(&), r_(s2)(Y) l(0) = 142.927 surface facing deflector: nonarcuate toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 107.1, K = −60.197, A = −3.5107E−6, B = 2.0684E−9, C = −8.9722E−14, D = 1.1672E−17 The values of r_(s1)(Y) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below. θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 3.940 8.207 13.200 16.757 19.451 23.281 r_(s1)(Y) −22.0 −25.07 −29.076 −40.588 −50.791 −65.907 −85.507 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −119.99, K = 4.78039 A = −3.4156E−6, B = 1.5437E−9, C = −1.8765E−12, D = 1.4637E−15

As for r_(s2)(Y), r_(s2)(Y′) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y′ 0 4.935 10.107 15.775 19.523 22.190 25.721 r_(s2)(Y′) −9.807 −10.12 −10.53 −11.32 −11.77 −12.22 −12.58

Let r_(s1)(Y′) be approximated as:

r_(s1)(Y)=a+b·Y²+c·Y⁴+d·Y⁶+e·Y⁸+f·Y¹⁰+g·Y¹²

Then, the coefficients a, b, c, d, e and f are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a=−22, b=−2.5751E-1, c=0.449657,

d=4.466449E-5, e=1.956944E-7,

f=−3.87E-10, g=2.79283E-13.

Let r_(S2)(Y′) be approximated as:

r_(S2)(Y′)=a′+b′·Y²+c′·Y′⁴+d′·Y′⁶, +e′·Y′⁸+f·Y′¹⁰+g′·Y¹²

Then, the coefficients a′, b′, c′, d′, e′, f′ and g′ are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a′=−9.807, b′=−1.662605E-2, c′=1.870374E-4,

d′=−1.27425E-6, e′=4,079722E-9,

f′=−6.029437E-12, g′=3.315003E-15

S(θ), d(θ), l(θ), r_(S1)′(Y) and r_(S2)′(Y) are listed below.

θ 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 S (θ) 22.274 22.689 23.997 26.399 28.509 30.261 32.924 d (θ) 10 9.876 9.452 8.551 7.635 6.793 5.386 l (θ) 142.887 144.327 148.338 154.765 159.674 163.608 168.608 r_(s1)′ (Y) −22 −24.732 −27.589 −36.35 −43.735 −55.259 −69.233 r_(s2)′ (Y′) −9.807 −10.101 −10.495 −11.382 −12.042 −12.761 −13.572

β(θ) are calculated by substituting the above data for the above-mentioned equation including P(θ). then, |β(θ)| and |β(θ)/β(0)| with respect to the deflection angle θ are produced, as listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 3.94 8.207 13.2 16.757 19.451 23.281 |β(θ)| 4.42 4.47 4.49 4.53 4.53 4.55 4.52 |β(θ)/β(0)| 1.0 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.02

|β(0)|=4.24 holds and satisfies the above-mentioned condition (3). |β(θ)| lies between |β(0)| and 1.03 |β(0)| and satisfies the above-mentioned condition (4).

FIG. 14 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 11. Because the surface of the lens 18 facing the deflector in Example 11 is identical in shape as the same surface of the lens 18 in Example 9, the field curvature in the main scanning direction, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity of Example 9 also hold.

EXAMPLE 12

S = 554.6 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak convergent beam). S(0) = 38.916 X₁(Y), r_(s1)(Y) d(0) = 15 n = 1.53664 X₂(Y), r_(s2)(Y) l(0) = 120.984 surface facing deflector: special toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 168.191, K = −39.924, A = −3.4224E−7, B = 2.2792E−13, C = 8.0209E−15, D = −8.7059E−19

The values of r_(S1)(Y) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 6.886 14.368 23.208 29.610 34.524 41.574 r_(s1)(Y) −31.0 −33.14 −45.56 −70.28 −81.84 −102.13 −126.96 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −188.994, K = −4.83793 A = −4.9817E−7, B = 7.7236E−12, C = −1.6386E−14, D = 1.7827E−18

As for r_(S2)(Y), r_(S2)(Y′) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y′ 0 8.348 17.093 26.710 33.136 37.760 43.915 r_(s2)(Y′) −13.91 −14.16 −15.25 −16.63 −16.99 −17.44 −17.54

Let r_(S2)(Y′) be approximated as:

r_(S2)(Y′)=a′+b′·Y′²+c′·Y′⁴+d′·Y′⁶+e′·Y′⁸+f′·Y′¹⁰+g′·Y′¹²

Then the coefficients a′, b′, c′, d′, e′, f′ and g′ are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a′=−13.91, b′=−2.866184E-3, c′=−1.21239E-5,

d′=2.690094E-8, e′=−2.090761E-11,

f′=6.668513E-15, g′=−6.73470E-19

S(θ), d(θ), l(θ), r_(S1)′(Y) and r_(S2)′(Y′) are listed below.

θ 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 S (θ) 38.916 39.656 42.01 46.417 50.376 53.81 58.794 d (θ) 15 14.747 13.884 12.038 10.135 8.354 5.324 l (θ) 121.012 122.213 125.713 131.319 135.629 138.898 143.746 r_(s1)′ (Y) −31 −32.676 −43.121 −62.437 −69.544 −84.248 −101.250 r_(s2)′ (Y′) −13.91 −14.145 −15.21 −16.769 −17.478 −18.376 −19.395

β(θ) are calculated by substituting the above data for the above-mentioned equation including P(θ). Then, |β(θ)| and |β(θ)/β(0)| with respect to the polarization angle θ are produced, as listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 6.886 14.368 23.208 29.610 34.524 41.573 |β(θ)| 2.19 2.20 2.25 2.29 2.28 2.27 2.27 |β(θ)/β(0)| 1.0 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04

|β(0)|=4.24 holds and satisfies the condition (3). |β(θ)| lies between |β(0)| and 1.04 |β(0)| and satisfies the condition (4).

FIG. 15 shows field curvatures, uniform velocity scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 12.

EXAMPLE 13

S = 316.7 (beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 is a weak convergent beam). S(0) = 48.618 X₁(Y), r_(s1)(Y) d(0) = 20.0 n = 1.53664 X₂(Y), r_(s2)(Y) l(0) = 106.282 surface facing deflector: special toric surface X₁(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = 200.224, K = −30.5827, A = −1.5926E−7, B = −4.0453E−12, C = 6.0017E−15, D = −3.9857E−19

The values of r_(S1)(Y) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 8.605 17.967 29.208 37.180 43.459 52.640 r_(s1)(Y) −30.0 −29.18 −28.76 −27.74 −26.56 −24.18 −17.02 surface facing surface 20: special toric surface X₂(Y) (nonarcuate shape) R = −224.092, K = 1.19901 A = −3.2013E−7, B = 7.0634E−12, C = −9.2418E−15, D = 1.9593E−18

As for r_(S2)(Y), r_(S2)(Y′) with respect to the deflection angle θ are listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y′ 0 10.583 21.558 33.647 41.714 47.523 55.334 r_(s2)(Y′) −15.32 −15.23 −15.12 −14.53 −13.64 −12.44 −9.34

Let r_(S1)(Y) be approximated as:

r_(S1)(Y)=a+b·Y²+c·Y⁴+d·Y⁶,+e·Y⁸+f·Y¹⁰+g·Y¹²

Then, the coefficients a, b, c, d, e, f, and g are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a=−30, b=1.521146E-2, c=−6.399798E-5,

d=1.166608E-7, e=−9.651438E-11,

f=3.652588E-14, g=−5.073881E-18

Let r_(S1)(Y′) be approximated as:

r_(S1)(Y′)=a′+b′·Y′²+c′·Y′⁴+d′·Y′⁶,+e′·Y′⁸+f·Y′¹⁰+g′·Y′¹²

Then coefficients a′, b′, c′, d′, e′, f′ and g′ are determined by a minimum square method as follows:

a′=−15.32, b′=1.12584E-3, c′=−3.490667E-6,

d′=5.91427E-9, e′=−4.057836E-12,

f′=1.284796E-15, g′=−1.500234E-19

S(θ), d(θ), l(θ), r_(S1)′(Y) and r_(S2)′(Y) are listed below.

θ 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 S (θ) 48.618 49.552 52.533 58.152 63.255 67.611 74.444 d (θ) 20 19.662 18.494 15.956 13.296 10.774 6.411 l (θ) 106.282 107.376 110.608 115.846 119.932 123.124 127.823 r₁′ (Y) −30.0 −28.769 −27.175 −24.561 −22.426 −19.745 −13.291 r_(s2)′ (Y′) −15.316 −15.220 −15.123 −14.736 −14.155 −13.233 −10.366

β(θ) are calculated by substituting the above data for the equation including P(θ). Then, |β(θ)| and |β(θ)/β(0)| with respect to the deflection angle θ are produced, as listed below.

θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 Y 0 8.605 17.967 29.076 37.180 43.459 52.640 |β(θ)| 1.46 1.45 1.44 1.42 1.41 1.41 1.40 |β(θ)/β(0)| 1.0 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.96

|β(θ)|=1.46 holds and satisfies the condition (3). |β(θ)| lies between |β(θ)| and 0.96 |β(θ)| and satisfies the condition (4).

FIG. 16 shows field curvatures, uniform scanning characteristic and linearity relating to Example 13.

As stated above, the illustrative embodiment has the following advantages.

(1) In an optical scanning device using a single scanning lens, a broad effective main scanning range and a compact configuration are achieved.

(2) When the above lens is molded out of plastics, sinking, waving and other errors in configuration are effectively obviated so as to enhance accurate configuration.

(3) Limitation on the tolerance of assembly of an optical element in the optical axis direction is reduced.

(4) In the above scanning device, field curvatures and uniform velocity scanning, characteristic in the main and subscanning directions are improved.

(5) In the above scanning device, the fluctuation of the diameter of a beam spot in the subscanning direction is effectively reduced.

2nd Embodiment

Referring to FIG. 17A, a second embodiment of the present invention is shown. In FIG. 17A, the same structural elements as the elements shown in FIG. 1A are designated by the same reference numerals.

As shown, a divergent beam issuing from the LD 10 is coupled by the coupling lens 12 which constitute a light source together with the LD 10. The beam from the light source is converged by the convex cylinder lens or line image forming optical system 14 in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction (perpendicular to the sheet surface of FIG. 17A). As a result, the beam forms a line image elongate in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction on the deflector or polygonal mirror 16. When the polygonal mirror 16 rotates, it deflects the incident beam at a uniform angular velocity. The deflected beam is incident to the scanning lens 18. The lens 18 focuses the incident beam in the form of a spot onto the surface 20 to be scanned. As a result, the surface 20 is scanned in the main scanning direction (up-and-down direction in the figure). Usually, a photoconductive element is located at the surface 20 and scanned by the above beam spot to form an image thereon. The effective main scanning width is indicated by letter W. The cylinder lens 14 may be replaced with a concave cylinder mirror.

In the illustrative embodiment, the coupling lens 12 functions to transform the bean issuing from the LD 10 to a weak convergent beam. Therefore, in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, the deflected beam with a deflection angle of zero degree is focused onto the previously stated natural convergence point Q if the lens 18 is absent. Specifically, assuming a virtual optical path formed by linearly developing an optical path between a light source and a surface to be scanned along an optical axis, the beam coupled by the coupling lens 12 converges to the point Q if the lens 18 is absent on the above virtual optical path.

The distance between the reflection surface 16 and the point Q is labeled S. When the point Q is located to the side of the surface 20 with respect to the deflector, the distance S is greater than zero; the coupled beam is a weak convergent beam. When the point Q is located to the side of the light source with respect to the polarizer, the distance S is smaller than zero; the coupled beam is a weak divergent beam. If the coupled beam is a parallel beam, the distance is infinite.

In FIG. 17A, X₁(Y) is representative of the shape of the first surface, as counted from the deflector side, as seen in the deflection plane (i.e.,shape shown in FIG. 17A) while X₂(Y) is representative of the shape of the second surface. Both of these shapes are nonarcuate shapes determined on the basis of R, K, A, B, C, D, . . . of the Eq. (1).

Further, in this embodiment, the lens 18 constitutes an image forming lens itself. Therefore, the lens 18 maintains the image forming position of the line image and the surface 20 in a geometrically conjugate relation in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction. In addition, the lens 18 is so configured as to desirably correct the field curvature in the subscanning direction. It follows that the first and/or the second surface of the lens 18, as counted from the deflector side, has a special toric surface, as shown in FIG. 17B or 17C. Let the shapes of the opposite surfaces of the lens 18 with respect to the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction (direction perpendicular to the sheet surface of FIG. 17A) be labeled x₁(Y) and x₂(Y), respectively.

In FIGS. 17B and 17C, a curve X(Y) shows the nonarcuate shape (R: paraxial radius of curvature in the Eq. (1)). A special toric surface is a surface in which the radius of curvature r(Y) of a circle of curvature in the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction is changed in accordance with the individual Y coordinate position of a nonarcuate shape in such a manner as to desirably correct the conjugate function and the field curvature in the subscanning direction. Generally, a line connecting the centers of curvatures for the radii of curvatures r(Y) is generally a curve, as shown in FIGS. 17A and 17C.

In the illustrative embodiment, the nonarcuate shape, as seen in the deflection plane, may be convex toward the deflector in the paraxial portion of the first lens surface and may be convex toward the surface 20 in the paraxial portion of the second lens surface.

Specific examples of the second embodiment will be described hereinafter. In the examples, as shown in FIG. 17A, the distance between the deflection start point of the deflector and the incidence surface of the lens 18 is assumed to be d₀. The lens 18 is assumed to have a thickness d₁ in the optical axis direction. The surface of the lens 18 facing the surface 20 and the surface 20 are assumed to be spaced a distance d₂ from each other. Therefore, L is equal to d₀+d₁+d₂. In the polarization plane, the lens 18 is assumed to have a paraxial radius of curvature R₁ on the side facing the polarizer and a paraxial radius of curvature R₂ on the side facing the surface 20. The refractive index (waveform: 780 mm) of the material of the lens 18 is labeled N. Further, the focal distance in the polarization plane is labeled fm.

The nonarcuate shape X₁(Y) of the first lens surface, as counted from the deflector side, is determined by giving R₁, K₁, A₁, B₁, C₁ and D₁. The nonarcuate shape X₂(Y) of the second lens surface is determined by giving R₂, K₂, A₂, B₂, C₂ and D₂.

When the first and/or the second lens surface is a special toric surface, a radius of curvature r₁(θ) and/or r₂(θ) is given to x₁(Y)=r₂(Y) and/or x₂Y=r₂(Y) for each of the deflection angles θ=0, 10, 20, 30, 36, 40 and 45 degrees (or=10, 20, 30 and 34 degrees in Example 6). It is to be noted that Y and θ have a relation of Y=d₀·θ.

In Examples 1-5 to be described, the effective main scanning width W is 216 mm while the effective half field angle θmax is 45 degrees. In Example 6, W and θmax are 216 mm and 34 degrees, respectively.

EXAMPLE 1

In this example, the beam coupled by the coupling lens is a parallel beam.

S = ∞, fm = 137.503 i Ri di N 0 29.887 1 137.503 12.364 1.53664 2 −154.248 132.649

The lens surface facing the deflector is a coaxial nonspherical surface and symmetrical with respect to the optical axis. Let this be denoted by X₁(Y)=x₁(Y). The lens surface facing the surface 20 is a special toric surface.

X₁(Y): R₁ = 237.503, K₁ = −92.438, A₁ = 1.11822 × 10⁻⁶, B₁ = 7.28745 × 10⁻¹⁰, C₁ = −3.20311 × 10⁻¹³, D₁ = 9.55204 × 10⁻¹⁷ X2(Y): R₂ = −154.248, K₁ = 5.36873, A₂ = −2.51300 × 10⁻⁶, B₂ = 1.95625 × 10⁻⁹, C₂ = −1.18490 × 10⁻¹², D₂ = 3.38372 × 10⁻¹⁶ r₂(θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r2 −17.083 −17.243 −17.658 −18.116 −18.463 −18.607 −18.803 fm = 136.503 (W/L = 1.23, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 21.6, (d₀/d₂) = 0.23

In Examples 2 and 3 to be described, the coupled beam is a weak divergent beam, so that S is smaller than zero. Again, the lens surface facing the deflector and the surface facing the surface 20 are a coaxial nonspherical surface and a special toric surface, respectively.

EXAMPLE 2

S = −391.925, fm = 108.193 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 22.381 1 108.193 10.000 1.53664 2 −121.259 142.519 X₁(Y) (= x₁(Y)): R₁ = 108.503, K₁ = −56.32541, A₁ = −3.46610 × 10⁻⁶, B₁ = 1.98195 × 10⁻⁹, C₁ = −1.32194 × 10⁻¹³, D₁ = 5.00528 × 10⁻¹⁷ X₂(Y): R₂ = 121.259, K₂ = 4.91312, A₂ = −3.24924 × 10⁻⁶, B₂ = 1.44308 × 10⁻⁹, C₂ = −1.89357 × 10⁻¹², D₂ = 1.43613 × 10⁻¹⁵ r₂ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r₂ −13.913 −14.070 −14.487 −14.979 −15,160 −15.181 −15.136 (W/L) = 1.23, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 26.7, (d₀/d₂) = 0.16

EXAMPLE 3

S = −796.535, fm = 125.223 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 25.505 1 125.223 12.700 1.48578 2 −114.374 136.695 X₁(Y) (= x₁(Y)): R₁ = 125.223, K₁ = −12.16377, A₁ = −3.41094 × 10⁻⁶, B₁ = 1.79586 × 10⁻⁹, C₁ = −2.13309 × 10⁻¹³, D₁ = 1.22926 × 10⁻¹⁶ X₂(Y): R₂ = −114.374, K₂ = 4.94342, A₂ = −1.42312 × 10⁻⁶, B₂ = 1.07576 × 10⁻⁹, C₂ = −1.88925 × 10⁻¹², D₂ = 1.20601 × 10⁻¹⁵ r₂ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r₂ −13.246 −13.396 −13.815 −14.395 −14.717 −14.871 −15.096 (W/L) = 1.23, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 21.0, (d₀/d₂) = 0.19

In Examples 4-6 to be described, the coupled beam is a weak convergent flux, so that S is greater than zero. In Examples 4 and 5, both the surface facing the deflector and the surface facing the surface 20 are special toric surfaces.

EXAMPLE 4

S = 551.935, fm = 168.191 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 38.916 1 168.191 15.000 1.5370 2 −188.994 120.984 X₁(Y) (= x₁(Y)): R₁ = 168.191, K₁ = −−39.925, A₁ = −3.42235 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = 2.27288 × 10⁻¹³, C₁ = 8.02089 × 10⁻¹⁵, D₁ = −8.70591 × 10⁻¹⁹ r₁ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r₁ −31.000 −33.138 −45.561 −70.282 −81.839 −102.128 −126.958 X₂(Y): R₂ = −188.994, K₂ = 4.83792, A₂ = −4.98172 × 10⁻⁷, B₂ = 7.72365 × 10⁻¹², C₂ = −1.63863 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.7827 × 10⁻¹⁸ r₂ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r₂ −13.910 −14.163 −15.245 −16.629 −16.990 −17.441 −17.540 (W/L) = 1.23, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 17.8, (d₀/d₂) = 0.46

EXAMPLE 5

S = 316.745, fm = 200.243 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 48.618 1 200.244 20.000 1.537664 2 −224.142 106.382 X₁(Y): R₁ = 200.244, K₁ = −30.283, A₁ = −1.59263 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −4.04532 × 10⁻¹², C₁ = 6.02170 × 10⁻¹⁵, D₁ = −3.98571 × 10⁻¹⁹ r₁ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r₁ −30.000 −29.182 −28.764 −27.743 −26.556 −24.175 −17.022 X₂(Y): R₂ = −224.142, K₂ = 1.1990 A₂ = −3.20126 × 10⁻⁷, B₂ = 7.06344 × 10⁻¹², C₂ = −9.24177 × 10⁻¹⁵, D₂ = 1.95829 × 10⁻¹⁸ r₂ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 36 40 45 r₂ −15.316 −15.232 −15.119 −14.531 −13.641 −12.436 −9.338 (W/L) = 1.23, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 13.3, (d₀/d₂) = 0.37

In Example 6 to be described, the lens surface facing the deflector is a coaxial nonspherical surface, i.e., X₁(Y)=x₁(Y) while the lens surface facing the surface 20 is a special toric surface.

EXAMPLE 6

S = +728.528, fm = 225.700 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 51.669 1 148.846 10.390 1.5241 2 −562.372 162.880 X₁(Y) (= x₁(Y)): R₁ = 148.846, K₁ = 5.4534, A₁ = −7.09267 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −2.21975 × 10⁻¹⁰ C₁ = 6.07139 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = −8.33979 × 10⁻¹⁸ X₂(Y): R₂ = −562.372, K₂ = −462.3035, A₂ = −4.60398 × 10⁻⁷, B₂ = −2.89720 × 10⁻¹¹ C₂ = −5.93656 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.73926 × 10⁻¹⁷ r₂ (θ): θ (°) 0 10 20 30 34 r₂ −25.651 −26.163 −27.558 −28.895 −28.836 (W/L) = 0.96, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 19.9, (d₀/d₂) = 0.32

As for the above special toric surface r(Y), an analytical representation is attainable by substituting the values Y(=d₀×θ) corresponding to the values θ for the following equation:

 r(Y)=a+b·Y²+c·Y⁴+d·Y⁶+e·Y⁸+f·Y¹⁰+g·Y¹²

and determining the coefficients a-g by use of simultaneous equations.

FIGS. 18-23 respectively show field curvatures and distortional aberrations relating to Examples 1-6. In each figure, a field curvature represented by a solid and a field curvature represented by a dashed line relate to the main scanning direction and the subscanning direction, respectively. The field curvature in the main scanning direction and the distortional aberration are effectively corrected by the nonarcuate shapes X₁(Y) and X₂(Y) determining the configuration of the lens in the deflection plane. Particularly, in Examples 4 and 5, the field curvature in the main scanning direction and the distortional aberration are both desirable.

The distortional aberration relates to the uniform velocity scanning function. The scanning velocity of the beam spot tends to increase with an increase in image height due to the beam polarized at a uniform angular velocity. In light of this, uniform velocity scanning is desirably realized by causing the aberration to increase at the portion where the image height increases, as illustrated. Further, the field curvature in the subscanning direction is desirably corrected by the special toric surface.

In Examples 7-15 to be described, both the first and second lens surfaces, as counted from the deflector side, are convex in the deflection plane, and each is a special toric surface. FIG. 17B shows the first lens surface while FIG. 17C shows the second lens surface. Only the data relating to the performance (field curvatures and uniform velocity scanning) in the direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, i. e., shape data in the deflection plane are given. The data relating to the direction corresponding to the subscanning direction, i.e., the radii of curvatures r(Y) in the above direction at the coordinate Y relating to the main scanning direction are optimized in each Example in a particular manner.

EXAMPLE 7

S = ∞, fm = 139.256 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 33.047 1 153.181 11.223 1.57210 2 −161.581 134.898 X₁(Y): R₁ = 153.181, K₁ = −15.522, A₁ = −4.90025 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −3.620007 × 10⁻¹¹ C₁ = 1.57778 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = 4.52347 × 10⁻¹⁸ X₂(Y): R₂ = −161.581, K₂ = 4.90839, A₂ = 2.30522 × 10⁻⁸, B₂ = −1.60484 × 10⁻¹⁰, C₂ = −5.10123 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 4.52347 × 10⁻¹⁷ (W/L) = 1.17, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 21.9, (d₀/d₂) = 0.24, R₁/fm = 1.1

EXAMPLE 8

S = ∞, fm = 137.047 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 34.511 1 274.094 12.045 1.57210 2 −108.062 133.443 X₁(Y): R₁ = 274.094, K₁ = −−0.488153 A₁ = −3.90047 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −3.64736 × 10⁻¹¹ C₁ = 1.52644 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = −4.46187 × 10⁻¹⁸ X₂(Y): R₂ = −108.062, K₂ = 2.98552, A₂ = 3.11749 × 10⁻⁷, B₂ = 2.04686 × 10⁻¹¹, C₂ = −4.65135 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.16507 × 10⁻¹⁷ (W/L) = 1.17, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 20.3, (d₀/d₂) = 0.26, R₁/fm = 2.0

EXAMPLE 9

S = ∞, fm = 137.041 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 34.305 1 205.561 11.945 1.57210 2 −124.060 133.750 X₁(Y): R₁ = 205.561, K₁ = −−4.42977, A₁ = −4.58583 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −3.92890 × 10⁻¹¹, C₁ = 1.47898 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = −8.64090 × 10⁻¹⁹ X₂(Y): R₂ = −124.060, K₂ = 3.52004, A₂ = 3.24804 × 10⁻⁷, B₂ = −9.05801 × 10⁻¹¹, C₂ = −4.80823 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.45322 × 10⁻¹⁷ (W/L) = 1.17, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 20.5, (d₀/d₂) = 0.26, R₁/fm = 1.5

EXAMPLE 10

S = 413.282, fm = 179.979 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 42.725 1 197.976 17.879 1.51933 2 −171.592 114.304 X₁(Y): R₁ = 197.976, K₁ = 5.03422, A₁ = −4.91745 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −1.83806 × 10⁻¹¹, C₁ = 1.63101 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = −8.38595 × 10⁻¹⁹ X₂(Y): R₂ = −171.592, K₂ = 4.60861, A₂ = −3.38197 × 10⁻⁸, B₂ = 3.65873 1.60484 × 10⁻¹¹, C₂ = −5.14531 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.28251 × 10⁻¹⁷ (W/L) = 1.20, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 14.1 (d₀/d₂) = 0.37, R₁/fm = 1.1

EXAMPLE 11

S = 492.845, fm = 168.271 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 45.430 1 252.407 17.300 1.51933 2 −130.535 117.270 X₁(Y): R₁ = 252.407, K₁ = −5.43257, A₁ = −3.90428 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −6.84195 × 10⁻¹² C₁ = 1.88037 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = −2.13891 × 10⁻¹⁸ X₂(Y): R₂ = −130.535, K₂ = −0.03984, A₂ = 2.85512 × 10⁻⁸, B₂ = 2.12059 × 10⁻¹¹, C₂ = −2.76749 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.01019 × 10⁻¹⁷ (W/L) = 1.17, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 14.2, (d₀/d₂) = 0.39, R₁/fm = 1.5

EXAMPLE 12

S = 746.803, fm = 156.939 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 41.457 1 313.879 14.327 1.57210 2 −123.669 124.216 X₁(Y): R₁ = 313.879, K₁ = 11.63499, A₁ = −2.71261 × 10⁻⁷, B₁ = −2.54808 × 10⁻¹¹, C₁ = 1.96321 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₁ = −2.73780 × 10⁻¹⁸ X₂(Y): R₂ = −123.669, K₂ = −0.03984, A₂ = 1.30110 × 10⁻⁷, B₂ = 5.58410 × 10⁻¹¹, C₂ = −3.31374 × 10⁻¹⁴, D₂ = 1.13522 × 10⁻¹⁷ (W/L) = 1.17, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 17.1 (d₀/d₂) = 0.33, R₁/fm = 2.0

EXAMPLE 13

S = −1066.595, fm = 124.231 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 27.989 1 136.654 10.110 1.57210 2 −144.109 136.660 X₁(Y): R₁ = 136.654, K₁ = 89.8649, A₁ = 3.58249 × 10⁻⁶, B₁ = −1.82151 × 10⁻⁹, C₁ = −1.84033 × 10⁻¹³, D₁ = 5.22868 × 10⁻¹⁷ X₂(Y): R₂ = −144.109, K_(2 = 7.53274,) A₂ = 4.10849 × 10⁻⁶, B₂ = 2.30006 × 10⁻⁹; C₂= −1.92530 × 10⁻¹², D₂ = 9.95898× 10⁻¹⁶ (W/L) = 1.20, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 25.0, (d₀/d₂ = 0.20, R₁/fm = 1.1

EXAMPLE 14

S = −646.979, fm = 118.255 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 28 1 177.382 10.725 1.57210 2 −106.959 140.375 X₁(Y): R₁ = 177.382, K₁ = −187.605; A₁ = −3.29591 × 10⁻⁶, B₁ = 1.90010 × 10⁻⁹, C₁ = −1.89600 × 10⁻¹³, D₁ = 2.05754 × 10⁻¹⁷ X₂(Y): R₂ = −106.959, K₂ = 5.99435, A₂ = −3.44944 × 10^(−6, B) ₂ = 2.49373 × 10^(−9,) C₂ = −1.83255 × 10^(−12, D) ₂ = 1.03695 × 10⁻¹⁵ (W/L) = 1.17(W/L)2 · (L/d₁)) = 24.5, (d₀d₂) = 0.21, R₁fm = 1.5

EXAMPLE 15

S = −607.344, fm= 117.840 i R_(i) d_(i) N 0 26.108 1 235.681 13.292 1.57210 2 −92.489 140.500 X₁(Y) (=x₁(Y)): R₁ = 235.681, K₁ = 426.354, A₁ = −3.07964 × 10⁻⁶, B₁ = 2.02800 × 10¹⁹, C₁ = 1.70546 × 10^(−13, D) ₁ = −9.47523 × 10⁻¹⁷ X₂(Y): R₂ = −92.489, K₂= 4.42119, A₂ = −2.74485 × 10⁻⁶, B₂ = 2.00025 × 10⁻⁹ C₂ = −1.83661 × 10^(−12, D) ₂ = 1.05160 × 10⁻¹⁵ (W/L) = 1.17, (W/L)² · (L/d₁) = 18.44, (d₀d₂= 0.19, Rb/fm = 2.0

FIGS. 24-32 respectively show field curvatures and distortional aberrations relating to Examples 7-15. Both the field curvatures and distortional aberrations relate to the main scanning direction and effectively corrected by the nonarcuate shapes X₁(Y) and X₂(Y). Adjustment is so made as to enhance the uniform velocity scanning characteristic because the distortional aberration relates to the uniform velocity scanning capability, as stated earlier.

As stated above, the second embodiment achieves the following advantages.

(1) Despite that a scanning lens has a single structure, it implements both the uniform velocity scanning function and the field curvature correcting function in the main scanning direction which are indispensable for a focusing lens as to the main scanning direction. In addition, the lens is free from errors in configuration ascribable to the molding of plastics.

(2) Because an image forming lens includes a scanning lens therein, a compact, yet broad, effective main scanning range is achievable and reduces the cost.

Various modifications will become possible for those skilled in the art after receiving the teachings of the present disclosure without departing from the scope thereof. 

What is claimed is:
 1. An image forming apparatus, comprising: a light source for emitting a beam; a beam deflector for deflecting the beam from said light source; and an optical scanning lens for converging the deflected beam to a beam spot on a surface to be scanned so as to scan said surface to be scanned at a uniform velocity, wherein said optical scanning lens comprises a biconvex single lens, and said biconvex single lens comprises a first lens surface and a second lens surface as counted from a beam deflector side, said first and second lens surfaces having a nonarcuate shape in a deflection plane determined by: X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y/R)²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+ where X represents a coordinate in an optical axis direction, Y represents a coordinate in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction, R represents a paraxial axis curvature radius, K represents a cone constant, A, B, C, D, . . . represent high order coefficients, respectively, R, K, A, B, C, D, . . . being given for specifying said nonarcuate shape; and W, d₁ and L satisfy the following relations: W/L≦0.9 and 10<(W/L)²·(L/d₁)<30, where W represents an effective main scanning width, d₁ represents a thickness of said lens and L represents a distance from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to a surface to be scanned, and said lens converging a deflected beam, deflected at uniform angular velocity by a beam deflector, onto said surface to be scanned so as to scan said surface to be scanned at a uniform velocity.
 2. The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein fm and R₁ satisfy the following relation: 1.0<R₁/fm<3.0, where fm represents a focal length, in said deflection plane, of said lens, and R₁ represents a paraxial curvature of radius, in said deflection plane, of said first lens surface of said lens.
 3. The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein d₀ and d₂ satisfy the following relation: d₀/d₂<0.3, where d₀ represents a distance on the optical axis from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to said first lens surface of said lens, and d₂ represents a distance on the optical axis from said second lens surface of said lens to said surface to be scanned, in a condition where said deflected beam, comprising a beam divergent with respect to a direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, is incident on said lens.
 4. The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein d₀ and d₂ satisfy the following relation: d₀/d₂>0.2, where d₀ represents a distance on the optical axis from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to said first lens surface of said lens, and d₂ represents a distance on the optical axis from said second lens surface of said lens to said surface to be scanned, in a condition where said deflected beam, comprising a beam convergent with respect to a direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, is incident on said lens.
 5. The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein d₀ and d₂ satisfy the following relation: 0.1<d₀/d₂<0.3, where d₀ represents a distance on the optical axis from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to said first lens surface of said lens, and d₂ represents a distance on the optical axis from said second lens surface of said lens to said surface to be scanned, in a condition where said deflected beam, comprising a beam approximately parallel with respect to a direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, is incident on said lens.
 6. The image forming apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said lens is made by plastic molding.
 7. An image forming method, comprising the steps of: emitting a beam; deflecting the beam; and converging the deflected beam to a beam spot on a surface to be scanned so as to scan said surface to be scanned at a uniform velocity, through an optical scanning lens, wherein said optical scanning lens comprises a biconvex single lens, and said biconvex single lens comprises a first lens surface and a second lens surface as counted from a beam deflector side, said first and second lens surfaces having a nonarcuate shape in a deflection plane determined by: X=Y²/[R+R{square root over ({1+L −(1+L +K)(Y/R)²+L })}]+A·Y⁴+B·Y⁶+C·Y⁸+D·Y¹⁰+ where X represents a coordinate in an optical axis direction, Y represents a coordinate in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis direction, R represents a paraxial axis curvature radius, K represents a cone constant, A, B, C, D, . . . represent high order coefficients, respectively, R, K, A, B, C, D, . . . being given for specifying said nonarcuate shape; and W, d₁ and L satisfy the following relations: W/L>0.9 and 10<(W/L)²·(L/d₁)<30, where W represents an effective main scanning width, d₁ represents a thickness of said lens and L represents a distance from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to a surface to be scanned, and said lens converging a deflected beam, deflected at uniform angular velocity by a beam deflector, onto said surface to be scanned so as to scan said surface to be scanned at a uniform velocity.
 8. The image forming method according to claim 7, wherein fm and R₁ satisfy the following relation: 1.0<R₁/fm<3.0, where fm represents a focal length, in said deflection plane, of said lens, and R₁ represents a paraxial curvature of radius, in said deflection plane, of said first lens surface of said lens.
 9. The image forming method according to claim 7, wherein d₀ and d₂ satisfy the following relation: d₀/d₂<0.3, where d₀ represents a distance on the optical axis from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to said first lens surface of said lens, and d₂ represents a distance on the optical axis from said second lens surface of said lens to said surface to be scanned, in a condition where said deflected beam, comprising a beam divergent with respect to a direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, is incident on said lens.
 10. The image forming method according to claim 7, wherein d₀ and d₂ satisfy the following relation: d₀/d₂>0.2, where d₀ represents a distance on the optical axis from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to said first lens surface of said lens, and d₂ represents a distance on the optical axis from said second lens surface of said lens to said surface to be scanned, in a condition where said deflected beam, comprising a beam convergent with respect to a direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, is incident on said lens.
 11. The image forming method according to claim 7, wherein d₀ and d₂ satisfy the following relation: 0.1<d₀/d₂<0.3, where d₀ represents a distance on the optical axis from a deflection start point of said beam deflector to said first lens surface of said lens, and d₂ represents a distance on the optical axis from said second lens surface of said lens to said surface to be scanned, in a condition where said deflected beam, comprising a beam approximately parallel with respect to a direction corresponding to the main scanning direction, is incident on said lens.
 12. The image forming method according to claim 7, wherein said lens is made by plastic molding. 